Module 30Preview

Psychometric Properties: Reliability, Validity, and Norms

15 min read·CUET PG Psychology

1. Architectural Blueprint & Classical Test Theory (CTT)

Psychological measurement rests on the foundation of Classical Test Theory (CTT), pioneered by Charles Spearman (1904) and formalized by Gulliksen (1950) and Lord & Novick (1968). CTT provides the mathematical framework for decomposing observed test scores into underlying true capability and measurement noise.

Rendering diagram...

The Axioms and Assumptions of Classical Test Theory

  1. Axiom of Additivity: Any observed raw score (XX) is the linear sum of an unobservable True Score (TT) and an unsystematic Error Score (EE): X=T+EX = T + E
  2. Expected Error is Zero: Over an infinitely large number of repeated administrations under identical conditions, random errors cancel out: E(E)=0orμE=0E(E) = 0 \quad \text{or} \quad \mu_E = 0
  3. Independence of True Score and Error: The magnitude of error is completely uncorrelated with the individual's true ability level: rTE=0orCov(T,E)=0r_{TE} = 0 \quad \text{or} \quad \text{Cov}(T, E) = 0
  4. Independence of Errors Across Occasions: Random error on Test 1 shares zero correlation with random error on Test 2: rE1E2=0orCov(E1,E2)=0r_{E_1 E_2} = 0 \quad \text{or} \quad \text{Cov}(E_1, E_2) = 0
  5. Independence of Error and Cross-Test True Score: Error on Test 1 is unrelated to the true score on Test 2: rT1E2=0r_{T_1 E_2} = 0

Variance Decomposition & Psychometric Definition of Reliability

Because True scores and Error scores are uncorrelated (Cov(T,E)=0\text{Cov}(T, E) = 0), the total observed score variance (σX2\sigma_X^2) equals the simple sum of True score variance (σT2\sigma_T^2) and Error variance (σE2\sigma_E^2):

σX2=σT2+σE2\sigma_X^2 = \sigma_T^2 + \sigma_E^2

Psychometrically, Reliability (rxxr_{xx}) is defined as the ratio of True score variance to Total observed score variance:

rxx=σT2σX2=σT2σT2+σE2=1−σE2σX2r_{xx} = \frac{\sigma_T^2}{\sigma_X^2} = \frac{\sigma_T^2}{\sigma_T^2 + \sigma_E^2} = 1 - \frac{\sigma_E^2}{\sigma_X^2}

  • Theoretical Range: 0.00≤rxx≤1.000.00 \le r_{xx} \le 1.00.
  • If a test has zero error (σE2=0\sigma_E^2 = 0), rxx=1.00r_{xx} = 1.00 (perfect reliability).
  • If a test score is pure noise (σT2=0\sigma_T^2 = 0), rxx=0.00r_{xx} = 0.00 (zero reliability).

The Standard Error of Measurement (SEMSEM)

The Standard Error of Measurement (SEMSEM) represents the standard deviation of an individual's observed scores around their true score over infinite testings. It quantifies the absolute margin of error in a test's score metric:

SEM=σX1−rxxSEM = \sigma_X \sqrt{1 - r_{xx}}

Where:

  • σX\sigma_X = Standard deviation of the total test scores.
  • rxxr_{xx} = Reliability coefficient of the test.
Rendering diagram...

Calculating Confidence Intervals for True Scores:

To communicate score imprecision ethically, examiners construct confidence intervals around the observed score (XX):

  • 68%68\% Confidence Interval: X±1.00(SEM)X \pm 1.00(SEM)
  • 95%95\% Confidence Interval: X±1.96(SEM)X \pm 1.96(SEM)
  • 99%99\% Confidence Interval: X±2.58(SEM)X \pm 2.58(SEM)

2. Methods of Estimating Reliability

Different empirical designs tap different sources of measurement error:

Rendering diagram...

Comparative Reliability Matrix

MethodAdministration DesignPrimary Source of Error Variance TappedAppropriate Formula / Metric
Test-RetestSame test given twice to same group after a time intervalTime Sampling: Fluctuations in mood, fatigue, illness, historical eventsPearson correlation coefficient (r12r_{12})
Parallel Forms (Immediate)Form A and Form B administered in immediate successionContent Sampling: Differences in item wording/sampling between formsPearson correlation (rABr_{AB})
Parallel Forms (Delayed)Form A and Form B administered with a time intervalContent Sampling + Time Sampling (Most rigorous reliability test)Pearson correlation (rABr_{AB})
Split-HalfSingle test given once; split into two halves (odd vs. even)Content Sampling: Item heterogeneity between the two halvesSpearman-Brown Prophecy Formula (rkkr_{kk})
Kuder-Richardson (KR-20)Single administration; dichotomously scored items (0/1)Content Sampling & Item Heterogeneity across varying item difficultiesKR-20KR\text{-}20 Formula
Kuder-Richardson (KR-21)Single administration; dichotomous items of equal difficultyContent Sampling (assumes uniform item difficulty pˉ\bar{p})KR-21KR\text{-}21 Formula
Cronbach's Alpha (α\alpha)Single administration; multipoint/Likert attitude itemsItem Inter-correlation & Construct HeterogeneityCoefficient Alpha (α\alpha)
Inter-Rater / ScorerTwo or more independent raters score identical protocolsInter-Scorer Differences: Examiner subjectivity, scoring ambiguityCohen's Kappa (κ\kappa) or Kendall's WW

Key Reliability Equations

1. The Spearman-Brown Prophecy Formula

When a test is split into halves, the Pearson correlation between the two halves (rhhr_{hh}) reflects the reliability of a test only half as long. Because test length directly impacts reliability, the Spearman-Brown formula estimates the reliability of the full-length test (k=2k = 2):

rtotal=2rhh1+rhhr_{\text{total}} = \frac{2 r_{hh}}{1 + r_{hh}}

General Formula for any length factor kk: rkk=k⋅r111+(k−1)r11r_{kk} = \frac{k \cdot r_{11}}{1 + (k - 1)r_{11}}

Where k=New LengthOld Lengthk = \frac{\text{New Length}}{\text{Old Length}} (e.g., if a 20-item test is lengthened to 60 items, k=3k = 3).

Formula to determine the factor kk required to attain a target reliability rkkr_{kk}: k=rkk(1−r11)r11(1−rkk)k = \frac{r_{kk}(1 - r_{11})}{r_{11}(1 - r_{kk})}

2. Kuder-Richardson Formulas (Dichotomous Items)

  • KR-20KR\text{-}20 (Unequal item difficulty): KR-20=NN−1(1−∑pqσX2)KR\text{-}20 = \frac{N}{N - 1} \left(1 - \frac{\sum pq}{\sigma_X^2}\right) Where NN = number of items, pp = proportion passing item, q=1−pq = 1 - p, and σX2\sigma_X^2 = variance of total test scores.
  • KR-21KR\text{-}21 (Equal item difficulty shortcut): KR-21=NN−1(1−Xˉ(N−Xˉ)NσX2)KR\text{-}21 = \frac{N}{N - 1} \left(1 - \frac{\bar{X}(N - \bar{X})}{N \sigma_X^2}\right) Where Xˉ\bar{X} = mean total test score. KR-21KR\text{-}21 always yields an estimate equal to or lower than KR-20KR\text{-}20.

3. Cronbach's Alpha (α\alpha) for Non-Dichotomous Data

For rating scales, attitude surveys, and Likert-type questionnaires (e.g., 1 to 5 scale):

Unlock Psychology

You've reached the end of the free preview. Get unlimited access to the complete course material and boost your preparation.

₹89/ subject
One-time payment · Complete access
  • All premium study modules
  • Unlimited practice quizzes & mocks
  • In-depth performance analysis & solutions
Secured by Razorpay